Cross-training LSAT logic games with the Reasoning Examination

I am preparing for the LSAT while training at the Society. The overlap is significant but not total.

The Reasoning Examination trains conditional logic — if/then, contrapositive, syllogistic chains. These are directly applicable to LSAT Logical Reasoning sections. The ramp-to-failure structure is better preparation than LSAT practice sets because it forces you to work at your ceiling, not below it.

Where it diverges: LSAT Logic Games require diagramming and spatial tracking that the Society does not train directly. I supplement with dedicated LG practice.

My approach: Society protocol in the morning (30 min), LSAT sections in the afternoon (60 min). The Society trains the faculty; the LSAT practice trains the format.

Standing Δ: +61. LSAT practice score: 168 → 172 over the same period. Correlation is not causation, but the reasoning improvement is felt.